Learning Path: CIO Guide for Microsoft Teams Governance
IT decision-makers: What content will be covered in the course of this learning path?
Balancing Between Purchase and In-House Development
Key Challenges and Solution Approaches
Guides & Studies by and for IT Experts
How IT Leaders Shape Governance for Success
Welcome to the 'Learning Path: CIO Guide for Microsoft Teams Governance.' As an IT leader, you play a crucial role in the successful implementation of Microsoft Teams as the central collaboration platform in your company. This learning path provides you with the necessary knowledge to effectively shape governance rules and processes.
The Role of Microsoft Teams Governance for IT Managers: What You Need to Know
The introduction of Microsoft Teams in the IT department is only the first step. Neglecting the administration and maintenance of Teams and SharePoint can lead to risks. These issues are exacerbated by continuous growth and a lack of scalability. Managing without clear rules and standards is tedious and resource-intensive. IT leaders have the responsibility to address these challenges.
Implementing an automated solution requires change management. Costs consist of internal, licensing, installation, configuration, and support expenses.
Quick Start, Clear Structures: How Automation Enhances Microsoft Teams Effectiveness
Strategies for Microsoft Teams Governance: Buy or Develop In-House?
Microsoft Teams Governance Software: Self-hosted vs. SaaS
Microsoft Teams deployed, what's next?
Effective Microsoft Teams Governance: Best Practices for a Productive and User-Friendly Environment
After the introduction of Teams, disorder and increasing IT costs may occur. To prevent this, it is advisable to standardize the creation of Teams, use channels and apps for clarity, and implement approval processes. Managing external users is also crucial. An automated governance concept can optimize processes. Standardizing naming conventions and document tagging improves discoverability. Inactive Teams should be archived, and the decision between dynamic memberships and automation must be made. Throughout, a balanced balance between freedom and control is essential.