We show you what to look for when choosing a Microsoft Teams governance tool if you have several thousand information workers.
A good software architecture and product vision can be more important for enterprises than cost.
The first criterion you look at is the cost of a governance tool you will have in place. The cost will help you with the speed of the internal approval process because you can justify a low-cost solution more easily.
But what happens if you make your decision to go with a low-cost solution and you can't roll it out in your organisation for various reasons such as security and privacy?
Or what happens if you have rolled out a low-cost solution in your organisation that cannot meet the requirements for scalability and dealing with Microsoft 365 limitations?
As an answer, you have chosen a tool that you either cannot roll out on your Microsoft 365 environment or have to work through multiple support tickets with your team after the roll-out.
Another result may be that you have to invest a lot of time in maintaining the tool.
Pay special attention to the following aspects when selecting a Microsoft Teams Governance tool in order to experience a successful roll-out phase and to have to deal with as few support tickets as possible:
These aspects are also valid if you have decided to build your own Microsoft Teams governance tool.
Since Valprovia was founded, many large companies already prefer Valprovia Teams Center. In this article, we would like to introduce you to the architecture of Teams Center and the resulting advantages in more detail.